tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-340634554199883217.post7429728800911216338..comments2023-10-31T12:17:42.008+00:00Comments on Adventures in the Print Trade: Mr. Knife Miss ForkNeilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18020242863144175965noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-340634554199883217.post-26740863997818292422011-11-28T09:57:21.751+00:002011-11-28T09:57:21.751+00:00Hi thhq - apologies for the late reply. Now you ha...Hi thhq - apologies for the late reply. Now you have raised the question I'm going to have to find a copy of Mr Knife Miss Fork in a library somewhere to compare the two, but at the moment my view is that the AMG print is an original not a reproduction. They are usually quite specific about the nature of the tipped-in plates (for instance making it clear in the same issue that the lithograph by Mariette Lydis is a reproduction). AMG's hors-texte plates seem to me a mixture of originals and reproductions, rather like other typographical journals of the period, such as Signature in the UK.Neilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18020242863144175965noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-340634554199883217.post-22467605345657476012011-11-09T23:02:49.397+00:002011-11-09T23:02:49.397+00:00Boy this is late, but I'm a fan of AMG. I hav...Boy this is late, but I'm a fan of AMG. I have serious doubts about whether the so-called Ernst photogram in AMG26 is really a photogram. AMG is a journal of typography, and every other insert appears to be a commercial reproduction of some kind. AMG even published articles on how the various reproductions were done in the 1900-1940 period.thhqhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07256574635664867999noreply@blogger.com